Call now for a FREE Consultation

DR31 Conviction Offence Code: Understanding Blood Sample Refusal Charges and Your Legal Options

A DR31 conviction code is issued when a driver who has been involved in an accident refuses to give permission for analysis of a blood sample that was taken without their consent whilst incapacitated. This serious drink-driving related offence carries 3 to 11 penalty points, a minimum 12-month driving disqualification, a maximum fine of £5,000 and up to 6 months’ imprisonment. The endorsement remains on your driving licence for 11 years from the date of conviction and classifies you as a high-risk offender, requiring a DVLA medical examination before licence reinstatement.

The DR31 offence code represents a unique situation within UK drink-driving law. Unlike other drink-driving offences where drivers actively refuse to provide specimens, DR31 applies specifically to circumstances where blood was taken from an incapacitated person without their consent, and they subsequently refused permission for that specimen to be analysed once they regained capacity.

What Is a DR31 Conviction Code?

A DR31 conviction is received when you refuse to give permission for the analysis of a blood specimen that was taken without your consent due to incapacity after driving or attempting to drive. This offence exists under Section 7A of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which was introduced by the Police Reform Act 2002.

The legislation permits police to request a medical practitioner to take a blood sample from someone who is incapacitated following an accident, typically when the person is unconscious or unable to give valid consent due to medical reasons. Once the individual regains capacity, they must be informed that the specimen was taken and asked for permission to have it analysed. Refusing to give this permission without reasonable excuse constitutes a criminal offence.

This provision places incapacitated drivers in the same legal position as those who are conscious at the time of specimen collection, ensuring fairness in drink-driving enforcement whilst protecting healthcare professionals from potential assault charges when taking samples without consent.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Talk to Caddick Davies Solicitors today

Use our contact page to send us a message or call us on 0333 443 2366 for a friendly chat.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

What Penalties Does a DR31 Conviction Carry?

A DR31 conviction results in 3 to 11 penalty points on your driving licence, an obligatory minimum disqualification of 12 months, a maximum fine of £5,000 and up to 6 months’ imprisonment. The exact penalty imposed depends on the circumstances of your case and is at the discretion of the magistrates’ court.

The 12-month minimum disqualification period is mandatory for all DR codes relating to driving or attempting to drive whilst unfit through drink, and courts have no discretion to impose a shorter ban unless special reasons are found. If you already have 9 or more penalty points on your licence when you receive a DR31 conviction, you face disqualification under the totting-up procedure, which carries a minimum 6-month ban.

The DR31 endorsement remains on your driving record for 11 years from the date of conviction, significantly longer than most other motoring offences which remain for 4 years. Courts can impose sentences ranging from community orders to immediate custody depending on aggravating factors such as high alcohol readings, previous convictions or accidents causing injury.

Why Would Blood Be Taken Without Consent?

Blood specimens are taken without consent when a person has been involved in an accident and is unable to give valid consent due to medical reasons, and a police constable believes they are incapable of consenting due to their condition. This typically occurs when someone is unconscious, seriously injured or in a state where they cannot understand what is being asked of them.

The Police Reform Act 2002 introduced this provision to address situations where drivers could not be prosecuted for drink-driving offences because evidence was unavailable. Before this legislation, individuals who were incapacitated following accidents were at a disadvantage compared to conscious drivers, and appropriate prosecutions could not proceed due to lack of evidence.

A forensic healthcare professional must be asked to take the specimen unless this is not reasonably practicable, in which case another doctor or registered healthcare professional may take it. The doctor in charge of the patient’s clinical care must be notified beforehand and has the right to object if taking the sample would be prejudicial to the patient’s care.

The specimen cannot be tested until the person regains competence and gives valid consent for analysis, creating the circumstances where a DR31 offence can occur if consent is subsequently refused.

What Constitutes Incapacity for Blood Sample Taking?

Incapacity is determined when a person is conscious of what they are doing but has not heard or fully understood the request for consent, or when they are unconscious or severely impaired due to injuries sustained in an accident. The legal test requires that the driver is unable to comprehend the procedures or instructions given to them.

Although it is the responsibility of the police constable to assess whether someone lacks capacity, healthcare professionals should satisfy themselves that the individual genuinely lacks capacity before taking a sample. This assessment must be carefully documented as it may later become relevant in court proceedings.

Incapacity attributable to medical reasons includes unconsciousness from head injuries, severe trauma requiring emergency treatment, or being medically sedated or paralysed for clinical procedures. Intoxication alone does not automatically constitute incapacity if the person can still understand and respond to requests.

Healthcare professionals are ethically permitted to refuse to take a specimen if the patient refuses or resists, if there are medical reasons why a specimen should not be taken, or if the person is expected to recover capacity within a short period.

What Are Reasonable Excuses for Refusing Permission?

Reasonable excuse is a defence that must be proved by the defendant on the balance of probabilities, and generally requires medical evidence showing a physical or mental incapability that directly caused the failure to give permission. The threshold for establishing reasonable excuse is high, and the test is not wholly subjective.

Common examples that may constitute reasonable excuse include severe mental disability preventing comprehension of the request, language barriers meaning genuine inability to understand the instructions, or ongoing medical conditions that make it impossible to provide valid consent. Physical incapability must have a direct causative link to the refusal to give permission.

Mere intoxication is not a reasonable excuse if the person can still understand the procedure being explained to them. Similarly, emotional distress, panic or fear of the consequences do not generally amount to reasonable excuses unless they are so severe as to remove the person’s capacity to make decisions.

Medical evidence is normally required to support a reasonable excuse claim, and expert reports must prove not only that a condition existed but that the condition specifically caused the refusal to give permission. Courts scrutinise these defences carefully and require compelling evidence before accepting them.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Talk to Caddick Davies Solicitors today

Use our contact page to send us a message or call us on 0333 443 2366 for a friendly chat.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

How Does DR31 Affect Car Insurance Costs?

Car insurance costs after a DR31 conviction increase significantly, with average quoted premiums of £4,098 compared to the UK average of £861, representing an increase of approximately 376%. This substantial increase reflects insurers’ assessment that drivers with drink-driving convictions present a higher risk of making claims.

You must disclose your DR31 conviction to all insurance providers when obtaining quotes, as failure to disclose is a breach of law and will invalidate your insurance. If you are stopped by police whilst driving without valid insurance due to non-disclosure, you will receive a driving ban, making it extremely difficult to find insurers willing to cover you in future.

Under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, you are only required to declare your DR31 conviction to insurers for 5 years following conviction, even though the endorsement remains on your licence for 11 years. After the 5-year rehabilitation period, the conviction becomes spent and you no longer need to disclose it when shopping for insurance.

Finding insurance with a DR31 conviction can be challenging as many mainstream insurers have underwriting terms that exclude high-risk drivers. Specialist convicted driver insurance brokers can help you access the market and compare quotes from insurers who accept drink-driving convictions.

Can You Avoid Disqualification with Special Reasons?

Special reasons provide a legal mechanism to avoid or reduce a mandatory disqualification, but they must be mitigating circumstances directly connected to the commission of the offence rather than personal circumstances of the offender. Special reasons do not constitute a defence to the charge, and you must either plead guilty or be convicted before they can be argued.

To establish special reasons, the defence must prove on the balance of probabilities that 4 criteria are met: the reason must be a mitigating or extenuating circumstance, it must not amount to a defence, it must be directly connected to the offence itself, and it must be something the court should properly consider when imposing sentence.

Examples of circumstances that may constitute special reasons in drink-driving cases include genuine medical emergencies requiring immediate action, shortness of distance driven with no intention to drive further, or spiked drinks where the driver had no knowledge of alcohol consumption. However, the threshold is high and courts take a dim view of weak arguments.

Personal circumstances such as loss of employment or hardship to family members cannot amount to special reasons, as these relate to the offender rather than the offence itself. If special reasons are found, the court has discretion to reduce the disqualification period or not impose one at all, but this is not automatic.

What Is the High-Risk Offender Scheme?

High-risk offenders must pass a medical examination with a DVLA-appointed doctor before their licence can be reinstated after disqualification ends. You are classified as a high-risk offender if you refused to allow a blood sample to be tested for alcohol, which applies directly to DR31 convictions.

The DVLA will send you a D27PH renewal form 90 days before your disqualification ends. You must complete this form and return it to DVLA to reapply for your licence. Once DVLA receives your application, they will send you details of approved doctors so you can arrange an appointment.

The medical examination includes completing a questionnaire about your medical history and alcohol use, participating in a physical examination, and having blood tests taken. You must pay for this examination yourself, and the doctor will submit their report directly to DVLA.

You will not receive your new licence until DVLA is satisfied that you are fit to drive again based on the medical evidence provided. This process ensures that individuals with drink-driving convictions pose minimal risk to road safety when they return to driving.

Does DR31 Result in a Criminal Record?

Yes, a DR31 conviction results in a criminal record that remains on your record indefinitely, although it becomes spent after the rehabilitation period under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974. The rehabilitation period depends on the sentence imposed by the court.

For DR31 convictions resulting in a fine or community order, the conviction becomes spent after 1 year from the date of conviction. If you receive a custodial sentence of 6 months or less, the rehabilitation period is 2 years from the end of the sentence. Custodial sentences between 6 months and 4 years have a rehabilitation period of 4 years.

Once a conviction is spent, you are not legally required to disclose it to most employers or organisations, although there are exceptions for certain professions requiring enhanced background checks. These include roles working with vulnerable adults or children, regulated financial services positions, and some healthcare professions.

The DR31 endorsement on your driving licence remains visible for 11 years regardless of when the conviction becomes spent for other purposes. This means employers who conduct driving licence checks can see the endorsement even after the conviction is spent for employment purposes.

How Can Caddick Davies Help with DR31 Charges?

We specialise exclusively in defending motorists charged with drink-driving and motoring offences across England and Wales, providing expert representation in magistrates’ courts nationwide. Our team has represented thousands of clients facing DR offence codes, achieving successful outcomes through detailed case analysis and robust court advocacy.

Our specialist motoring solicitors understand the complexities surrounding DR31 charges, including the specific legal requirements for blood sample taking from incapacitated drivers and the defences available. We examine every aspect of your case, from the legality of the blood sample taking procedure to whether you had a reasonable excuse for refusing permission for analysis.

We operate on a fixed fee basis with transparent pricing, meaning you know exactly what your representation will cost with no hidden charges or unexpected bills. Our fees are affordable and accessible to all motorists, with flexible payment terms available depending on your individual circumstances.

We provide a free initial telephone consultation where you can discuss your DR31 charge with an experienced motoring solicitor. During this consultation, we will give you an honest assessment of your case, the likelihood of success with any potential defences, and the help we can provide. We focus on achieving the best possible outcome, whether that involves defending the charge, arguing special reasons to avoid disqualification, or mitigating the sentence imposed.

Our national coverage means we can represent you at any magistrates’ court in England and Wales, regardless of where your offence took place. Contact us today to discuss your DR31 charge and explore your legal options with specialist motoring defence solicitors who understand the unique challenges these cases present

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Talk to Caddick Davies Solicitors today

Use our contact page to send us a message or call us on 0333 443 2366 for a friendly chat.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Why Caddick Davies?

There are a number of factors which make Caddick Davies the ideal option for anyone facing a motoring charge in England or Wales:

Over,casescovered

Over 10,000 cases covered

Our extensive experience allows us to choose the most effective legal approach to each case

Learn more
Trust Pilot Reviews

1700+ 5 Star Reviews on TrustPilot

We are proud to have a wealth of clients who have appreciated our services and who would recommend us to any friends or family who find themselves facing a motoring charge.

Learn more
UK's Leading Motoring lawyers

UK’s Leading Motoring Solicitors

We have a highly-effective track record in defending motoring charges, leading to no penalties, or considerably reduced penalties, being imposed on our clients.

Learn more

Make an Enquiry

Call Us on 03334 432 366 or enter your details below:

    Your data is secure

    Why Choose Us

    • Ranked in the top 3 law firms by Trustpilot
    • Nationwide Legal Coverage
    • Free Consultation
    • Fixed Fee Terms
    • Competitive Rates
    • Flexible Payment Plans
    • Trusted Legal Care
    • UK’s Leading Motoring Solicitors

    We have been successfully representing clients in motoring courts nationwide

    Contact us for a free consultation, our expert solicitors will be able to discuss your case and advise on legal options.

    Birmingham
    Bradford
    Bristol
    Carlisle
    Cardiff
    Chelmsford
    Huddersfield
    Hull
    Manchester
    Liverpool
    Leeds
    London
    Newcastle
    Norwich
    Nottingham
    Sheffield

    Request free consultation
    UK Map

    What Our Clients Say

    We truly value and appreciate the feedback we receive from our clients, as we look to improve the services we offer on an ongoing basis.

    Read more feedback

    Not found what you're looking for?

    Motoring Offence Services

    layers

    Speeding

    layers

    Exceptional hardship and totting up

    layers

    No Insurance

    layers

    Using a Mobile Phone

    layers

    Failing to Identify the Driver

    layers

    Careless Driving

    layers

    Dangerous Driving

    layers

    Failing to Stop and Report an Accident

    layers

    Drink Driving

    layers

    Medical Revocation

    layers

    Drug Driving

    layers

    Motoring Offence Solicitors