Why Choose Us
- Ranked in the top 3 law firms by Trustpilot
- Nationwide Legal Coverage
- Free Consultation
- Fixed Fee Terms
- Competitive Rates
- Flexible Payment Plans
- Trusted Legal Care
- UK’s Leading Motoring Solicitors
5 out of 5
Our customers rate us
“EXCELLENT”
AS SEEN ON
01.10.2025
Common Myths: Speeding & Speed Cameras
There are many myths surrounding the rules and regulations for speeding offences, as well as the use of speed cameras to detect speeding on the road.
This article aims to address some of those common misconceptions.
We often hear people stating that they have been charged with a speeding offence, despite the “10%+2 rule”. The belief being that if you have exceeded the speed limit, that the police cannot charge you if you were travelling up to 10% +2 over the speed limit. This is a myth.
Many police forces do allow some leeway and will not charge an offender with an offence of speeding if they have only “marginally” exceeded the speed limit. However, the margin varies from police force to police force.
The myth arises from the National Police Chief’s Council (NPCC) guidelines, which state that police should allow a discretion of 10% + 2mph. However, not all police forces apply this guidance.
Below are some of the police forces that have publicly confirmed that they are enforcing the above guidance:
Despite the above, this is discretionary only. The police do not have to adhere to this.
Essex Police are one of the police forces who have confirmed that they do not adhere to the guidlelines set out by the NPCC – Speed camera numbers and advice on activation thresholds | Essex Police.
In summary: The Police can charge someone with an offence of speeding even if they are only 1mph over the speed limit. There is nothing, in law, to state that they cannot do so. Any other guidance or policy is a matter of discretion only.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Talk to Caddick Davies Solicitors today
Use our contact page to send us a message or call us on 0333 443 2366 for a friendly chat.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
It is often suggested that speed cameras are only in place to generate money for those who operate the cameras. This is a myth. Whilst a lot of money is generated by speed cameras, through court prosecution for offences or acceptance of Fixed Penalties, this is not the objective of cameras being in place.
This is untrue for two reasons:
A study carried out by Cheng Keat Tang at the London School of Economics in 2017 (https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/86567/1/sercdp0221.pdf) held that the addition of 1,000 speed cameras on the road could reduce approximately 1130 crashes, prevent approximately 330 serious injuries, save approximately 190 lives each year and generating benefits of up to £21 million for the government.
In summary: Yes, speed cameras do generate a lot of money – however, that is not the objective of them. The primary objective of speed cameras is to ensure road safety and to reduce casualties.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Talk to Caddick Davies Solicitors today
Use our contact page to send us a message or call us on 0333 443 2366 for a friendly chat.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Another common myth is that speed cameras must be visible and that they must be signposted. This is a myth. This also applies to officers using equipment and static speed vans.
There is currently no legislation that requires for a speed camera to be visible or signposted, nor are they required to be painted yellow.
Speed cameras will typically be sign posted or clearly visible, however, this is to act as a valuable deterrent to prevent people from speeding rather than being a mandatory requirement.
The only requirement that is mandatory, is for the speed limit to be properly signposted by way of a commencement sign. Below is an example of what a “commencement” sign looks like:
Once the above commencement sign has been displayed, the government expect road users to adhere to the speed limit and therefore there should be no requirement to warn road users of any speed detection devices. However, as above, many cameras are signposted as the government want to encourage road safety, and therefore cameras are in place to act as a deterrent.
No repeater signs are necessary once a commencement sign is displayed. However, many roads will have repeater signs to remind drivers of the speed limit that is in place. It is the responsibility of the driver to be paying adeqaute attention of their surroundings, including the road signage, to ensure that they are always aware of the speed limit that they are driving on.
Where there is a change of a speed limit, the police will generally offer leeway to road users for a certain period after the change i.e. avoiding prosecution until road users are familiar with the change. The below signage may also be used to draw road users attention to the change of speed limit on a road:
If warnings are given for a speed camera, then the below signage would usually be posted. However, it must be emphasised, that this is not mandatory:
We often hear individuals insisting that they must be offered a speed awareness course by the police and a variety of reasons are given e.g. that this is their first offence, that the offence is only “minor”.
This is a myth. The police are not required, in any circumstances, to offer a speed awareness course. These courses have criteria that must be met for the courses to be offered. However, it is still the police’s discretion as to whether they are offered.
The below is the criteria that must be met for the course to be offered:
The offence will only qualify for a speed awareness course based on the below thresholds:
It is important to note that only the police can offer a speed awareness course. The Court cannot impose a course. Therefore, once an offence has been issued with court proceedings, it is too late for it to be reverted back to the offer of a course. As a result, if a course is offered, care should be taken if you are considering refusing this offer. Once the offer has been removed, the police cannot re-issue the offer.
Below are some quick fire answers to some other, less common, myths:
What can be taken from all of the above is quite simple. Do not exceed the speed limit. However, there are of course many instances where:
If any of the above circumstances apply we would encourage you to reach out to one of the lawyers to discuss your case further.
We are here to fight your corner and have the expertise, experience, and commitment to secure the best possible outcome for your circumstances. Contact us today for your free initial consultation on 03334 432 366 and take the first step towards protecting your driving licence and future.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Talk to Caddick Davies Solicitors today
Use our contact page to send us a message or call us on 0333 443 2366 for a friendly chat.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Why Choose Us
We have been successfully representing clients in motoring courts nationwide
Contact us for a free consultation, our expert solicitors will be able to discuss your case and advise on legal options.
Birmingham
Bradford
Bristol
Carlisle
Cardiff
Chelmsford
Huddersfield
Hull
Manchester
Liverpool
Leeds
London
Newcastle
Norwich
Nottingham
Sheffield